Although there were no formal debate ’sponsors’, the Beard Ramsbottom and Partners firm, Grabner Penrose INC., and the society for it equipment recycling acquisition all foot the bill for the auditorium rental and concession
January 28, 2012 – 12:05 am | byOverall, most members of the audience were impressed with the candid replies presented by the it equipment recycling sector leaders. Lelia Bostelman, an administrative assistant in the Wittmeyer Spahr and Partners firm, stated, “I really believe that my employers are genuine and care about what they do…They are not out to prey on people or report false numbers, they just want to make money and provide for the welfare of their company just like anyone else.” “I truly believe that our customers, not regulatory agencies, are the best source of it equipment recycling marketing feedback. Face it, if we’re not making money and our customers are pissed off, our marketing methods are wrong and not productive. Don’t forget that private companies are in the business to make cash, and don’t make a profit banging their heads against the walls,” revealed Adcock Route, CMO of Arnwine Bellany and Grange Marz INC. This assertion brought the audience to their feet, although a few sat quietly in anticipation of a rebuttal from opposition team member Higley Graise, a staunch believer in good ethics and standards. The it equipment recycling debate was considered a success and portions were televised on local news channels the next day. Response was positive and most people left the auditorium with a better impression of how things work in the it equipment recycling industry, and we impressed with the candor and openness of major corporate executives. Following initial discussions, technology moderator Eboni Ibarra, asked the debate teams about the use of SPAM email in their it equipment recycling marketing campaigns, which created a light chuckle from the audience. Killilea Malcom, from the Brake Porcelli & Boeding Munos LLC firm, stated, “We’re not hawking viagra - so don’t worry, our email campaigns aren’t that bad… but we also affirm the use of double opt-in email lists to assure that customers who are truly interested in our it equipment recycling products get the right emails.” An interesting questions regarding it equipment recycling financial reporting and auditing was offered by Wiemer Peto, the moderator of the second session: “Do you, as business leaders and executives, make sure that your books are 100% accurate and sound, or do you leave this task to your respective accounting agencies’” Obviously, all the executives replied that they personally sign-off on any financial reporting, especially in light of new it equipment recycling accounting legislation, but some were frank and stated that they allow their finance teams a lot of latitude. “I see to it that all our data is accurate,” stated CEO Sharlene Hoff, “but I trust our finance department to crunch the numbers correctly and report accurately. At the end of the day, it is my job to move the business forward, not be a slave to my calculator and Exel spreadsheets.” The main debate started with Ruland Kirch from the Motil Falcon Corp. firm, who suggested that marketing in the it equipment recycling industry is an evolutionary process, akin to any other industry where earning potential is high and customer retention is key. “I personally believe it equipment recycling marketing practices of today that are thought of as inappropriate will be the future of tomorrow’s it equipment recycling industry leaders. We must move forward if we wish to continue to provide top level service to our customers…” Opposition team member Coleen Eunice, partner in the smaller firm Kenndy Duchesne INC LTD., stated the opposite: “We need to stick to our guns and abide by best practice methods in order to preserve the integrity of the it equipment recycling industry as a whole. If we degrade ourselves by using cheap marketing practices to make a quick buck, we will only be hurting ourselves in the long run.” Moderator Limehouse Bueter opened the it equipment recycling discussion with a brief introduction of the debate objectives and rules. Each team leader would be allowed a five minute introduction, followed by brief overviews of their debate topics. Other team members would have one minute to state their points of view in relation to the team leader’s overview. After a brief intermission, moderator Kimbra Kaluzny returned to the podium with introductory remarks for the second session. Dyche Steckman described the next debate as one centered on it equipment recycling marketing ethics in the short-term and long term. As with the first session, debate team members focused on the dynamic nature of the market, and emphasized the fact that what works one day will not necessarily work the next. After the it equipment recycling topic introductions, associate moderator Daisey Lais briefly paused for questions from the news media, who lined up at a centrally located microphone in the auditorium. Most members of the media were curious about recent news items, although a few bashed members of the Hereda Rappley it equipment recycling marketing and advertising firm, who were alledgely involved in multi-level marketing schemes.
| Posted in »